課程資訊
課程名稱
面對全球治理的法律典範:路徑選擇及其挑戰
Taming Global Governance: Responses and Challenges 
開課學期
103-1 
授課對象
法律學院  法律學系  
授課教師
郭銘松 
課號
LAW5246 
課程識別碼
A21 U5090 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期一9,A(16:30~19:15)星期四3,4(10:20~12:10) 
上課地點
法1402 
備註
2-hr classes on Thu & Mon b/w Dec 11 & Jan 8
限學士班三年級以上
總人數上限:40人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1031LAW5246 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

上課期間:2014年12月11日~2015年1月8日 四週密集上課
上課日期:2014年12月11,15,18,22,25,29日及2015年1月5,8日。

本課程的目的在於引發學生對全球治理所衍生法律應如何回應的思考興趣,並培養學生就全球治理是否顛覆既有法律典範衝擊的分析能力。課程分為三大部分:第一至第三次上課將集中討論三種務實主義取向的回應方式,第四至第八七次上課則環繞各種「憲法化」 (constitutionalisation) 策略的討論,第八次則對於全球治理下的法律,權威與主權等問題進行批判與反思。

評量方式為期末考試。

As governance displaces government in the debate over the postnational political world, various proposals emerge to frame global governance in legal terms. Yet, the question whether global governance is the culmination of the rule of law or suggests the end of law remains contentious. The objective of this module is to equip students with the ability to critically analyse the distinct paradigms of law looming from the principal approaches to tame global governance with the rule of law. In addition to the introductory session (session 1), the module will first introduce three non-constitutional, pragmatic legal responses to global governance (sessions 2-4). Following discussion of varieties of constitutionalisation strategies (sessions 5-8), the module will conclude with critical reflections on the challenges global governance poses towards our understanding of law, authority, and sovereignty (session 9).

Assessment Method: One two-hour examination.  

課程目標
引發學生對全球治理所衍生法律應如何回應的思考興趣,並培養學生就全球治理是否顛覆既有法律典範衝擊的分析能力。 
課程要求
課程對象:以研究所學生與大學部三年級以上者為限。
必要具備條件:良好程度的英文閱讀能力,具備參與課堂討論的能力與熱忱。

Target Group: Graduate students and junior/ senior undergraduates with interest in the legal issues concerning globalisation.
Required Skills: Good English reading comprehension; engagement with class discussion and debate.  
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
 
指定閱讀
Session 1 (Thursday, 11th December): Module Overview and Regulatory Pragmatism (I): Globalised Administrative Law
Required Reading:
Esty, Daniel C. ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’. Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1490-1562.
Recommended Reading:
Aman, Alfred C, Jr. ‘Globalization, Democracy, and the Need for a New Administrative Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10 (2003): 125-55
Barak-Erez, Daphne and Oren Perez. ‘Whose Administrative Law Is It Anyway? How Global Norms Reshape the Administrative State’. Cornell International Law Journal 46 (2013): 455-97.
Session 2 (Monday, 15 December): Regulatory Pragmatism (II): International Public Authorities
Required Reading:
Alvarez, Jose E. International Organizations as Law-makers (OUP 2005) 74-100, 109-46.
von Bogdandy, Armin, Philipp Dann, and Matthias Goldmann. ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 1375-1400.
Recommended Reading:
Venzke, Ingo. ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions' Authority in Making Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 354-73.
Session 3 (Thursday, 18 December): Regulatory Pragmatism (III): Global Administrative Law
Required Reading:
Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch, and Richard B Stewart. ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’. Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005): 15-62.
Recommended Reading:
Cassese, Sabino. ‘Administrative Law without the State? The Challenge of Global Regulation’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (2005): 663-94.
Somek, Alexander. ‘Administration without Sovereignty’ in The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin eds, OUP 2010) 267-87.
Session 4 (Monday, 22nd December): Discovering Global Constitutionalism (I): Supranational Legality
Required Reading:
Weiler, JHH. ‘The Transformation of Europe’. Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2403-83.
Recommended Reading:
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 233-57.
Session 5 (Thursday, 25th December): Discovering Global Constitutionalism (II): New Conflict of Laws
Required Reading:
Joerges, Christian, Poul F Kjaer, and Tommi Ralli. ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’. Transnational Legal Theory 2 (2011): 153-65.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (2013): 437-68.
Recommended Reading:
Joerges, Christian. ‘Sozialstaatlichkeit in Europe? A Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Law of the EU and the Proceduralisation of Constitutionalisation’. German Law Journal 10 (2009): 335-60.
Session 6 (Monday, 29th December): Discovering Global Constitutionalism (III): Constitutionalised International Law
Required Reading:
Klabbers, Jan, Anne Peters, and Geir Ulfstein. The Constitutionalization of International Law (OUP 2012 reprinted) 81-125.
Paulus, Andreas L. ‘The International Legal System as a Constitution’ in Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 69-112.
Recommended Reading:
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2006): 9-36.
Kennedy, David. ‘The Myth of Global Governance’ in Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 37-68.
Session 7 (Monday, 5th January): Law and Society 2.0: Societal Constitutionalism
Required Reading:
Teubner, Gunther. ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’ in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Christian Joerges, Inger-Johannes sand, and Gunther Teubner eds, Hart 2004) 3-28.
Walker, Neil. ‘Beyond the Holistic Constitution?’ in The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin eds, OUP 2010) 291-308.
Recommended Reading:
Teubner, Gunther. Constitutional Fragments: Societal constitutionalism and Globalization (OUP 2012) 42-123.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘Semantic Constitutionalism at the Fin de Siecle’. Transnational Legal Theory 5 (2014): 158-75.
Session 8 (Thursday, 8th January): In the Long Shadow of Law, Authority, and Sovereignty: Global Governance on Trial
Required Reading:
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (OUP 2010) 71-105, 264-96.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘Inter-Public Legality or Post-Public Legitimacy? Global Governance and the Curious Case of Global Administrative Law as a New Paradigm of Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2012): 1050-75.
Recommended Reading:
Weiler, JHH. ‘The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’. Zeitschrift fur auslandisches offentliches Recht und Volkerrecht (ZaoRV) (aka Heidelberg Journal of International Law) 64 (2007): 547-62.
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’. Modern Law Review 70 (2007): 1-30.
Examination (Monday, 12nd January) 
參考書目
待補 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
   
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
第1週
12/11  Required Reading:
Esty, Daniel C. ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’. Yale Law Journal 115 (2006): 1490-1562.

Recommended Reading:
Aman, Alfred C, Jr. ‘Globalization, Democracy, and the Need for a New Administrative Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10 (2003): 125-55
Barak-Erez, Daphne and Oren Perez. ‘Whose Administrative Law Is It Anyway? How Global Norms Reshape the Administrative State’. Cornell International Law Journal 46 (2013): 455-97. 
第2週
12/15  Required Reading:
Alvarez, Jose E. International Organizations as Law-makers (OUP 2005) 74-100, 109-46.
von Bogdandy, Armin, Philipp Dann, and Matthias Goldmann. ‘Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities’. German Law Journal 9 (2008): 1375-1400.
Recommended Reading:
Venzke, Ingo. ‘Between Power and Persuasion: On International Institutions' Authority in Making Law’. Transnational Legal Theory 4 (2013): 354-73.  
第3週
12/18  Required Reading:
Kingsbury, Benedict, Nico Krisch, and Richard B Stewart. ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’. Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (2005): 15-62.
Recommended Reading:
Cassese, Sabino. ‘Administrative Law without the State? The Challenge of Global Regulation’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 37 (2005): 663-94.
Somek, Alexander. ‘Administration without Sovereignty’ in The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin eds, OUP 2010) 267-87. 
第4週
12/22  Required Reading:
Weiler, JHH. ‘The Transformation of Europe’. Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2403-83.
Recommended Reading:
Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘Human Rights and International Constitutionalism’. Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 233-57. 
第5週
12/25  Required Reading:
Joerges, Christian, Poul F Kjaer, and Tommi Ralli. ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’. Transnational Legal Theory 2 (2011): 153-65.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘On the Constitutional Question in Global Governance: Global Administrative Law and the Conflicts-Law Approach in Comparison’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (2013): 437-68.
Recommended Reading:
Joerges, Christian. ‘Sozialstaatlichkeit in Europe? A Conflict-of-Laws Approach to the Law of the EU and the Proceduralisation of Constitutionalisation’. German Law Journal 10 (2009): 335-60. 
第6週
12/29  Required Reading:
Klabbers, Jan, Anne Peters, and Geir Ulfstein. The Constitutionalization of International Law (OUP 2012 reprinted) 81-125.
Paulus, Andreas L. ‘The International Legal System as a Constitution’ in Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 69-112.
Recommended Reading:
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes About International Law and Globalization’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2006): 9-36.
Kennedy, David. ‘The Myth of Global Governance’ in Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Jeffrey L Dunoff and Joel P. Trachtman eds, CUP 2009) 37-68. 
第7週
01/05  Required Reading:
Teubner, Gunther. ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’ in Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Christian Joerges, Inger-Johannes sand, and Gunther Teubner eds, Hart 2004) 3-28.
Walker, Neil. ‘Beyond the Holistic Constitution?’ in The Twilight of Constitutionalism? (Petra Dobner and Martin Loughlin eds, OUP 2010) 291-308.
Recommended Reading:
Teubner, Gunther. Constitutional Fragments: Societal constitutionalism and Globalization (OUP 2012) 42-123.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘Semantic Constitutionalism at the Fin de Siecle’. Transnational Legal Theory 5 (2014): 158-75. 
第8週
01/08  Required Reading:
Krisch, Nico. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (OUP 2010) 71-105, 264-96.
Kuo, Ming-Sung. ‘Inter-Public Legality or Post-Public Legitimacy? Global Governance and the Curious Case of Global Administrative Law as a New Paradigm of Law’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (2012): 1050-75.
Recommended Reading:
Weiler, JHH. ‘The Geology of International Law – Governance, Democracy and Legitimacy’. Zeitschrift fur auslandisches offentliches Recht und Volkerrecht (ZaoRV) (aka Heidelberg Journal of International Law) 64 (2007): 547-62.
Koskenniemi, Martti. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’. Modern Law Review 70 (2007): 1-30. 
第9週
01/12  Examination